Skip to main content

RUDIMENTS 515.

RUDIMENTS, pt. 515
(penitential omnipotence)
My own ways of processing
thought, I think, were always
different. I was never one for
much of that slap-back happy
guy stuff, and I liked to measure
progress (and prosperity) by
intangibles; things other people
would look at me crazily for.
(They would also look at me
AS IF I was crazy, but that's 
a different thought  -  if you 
take the time to compare the 
two statements, you'll see).
Items that would preoccupy
me for hours would make
other people deliriously 
bored. I got away with a
lot of that in the seminary,
because it could all be easily 
concealed as either 'praying'
or 'studying.' One great hook
in to a million things language
wise was the study of Latin.
Like the word omnipotent  -  
it was most often, in seminary 
days, used as the character
description for God  -  The
Father. These distinctions had
to be made, because, I don't
think, the claim of omnipotence
was ever given to Jesus  -  a
chip off the old block, if you
will. That always struck me
as strange, that diminishment,
but I guess it wasn't hereditary.
It kind of always baffled me, but
no one really dwelt too much
on that stuff. They just went
along. I always felt as if I was
on a pony express wagon, one
surging westward  -  the wagon's
running, it's loaded up with mail,
everything's running along, so
DON'T stop and inspect the
wheels, OK (?). OK.
-
If you break it down, Latin wise,
it's merely the combined effort
of OMNI, which means 'all'  -
like a bus has 'omnibus' plates,
and POTENT, which, obviously,
means power, strength, potency.
OK, that's pretty clear. (You can
do that with Latin, because must
of our words now, or a lot of
them anyway, can easily be 
distilled down to their roots).
It all always fascinated me, 
and a lot of really magical 
stuff, by it, has come through.
Like the simple word 'today.'
Way back, in Latin days, it
was 'hoc die'  -  which means
'this day'. Then, still in Latin,
it was shortened down to 
'hodie,' (ho-dee-ay) which
is Latin for 'today.' Then,
over the years and through
all those settlements and 
tribal meshes and wars and
all long after the Romans,
it entered the Germanic and
English tongues, as they
slowly developed, as a 
variant  -  our 'today.' So
very cool, no? This sort of
thing happened thousands 
of times, and if you still
study the language and its
uses, examples of such can
be found most everywhere.
-
So, back to omnipotent  -  
man, that was quite the 
concept to throw around. 
It is, in its reality, just a 
word, but these doctrinaire
clerics and religious guys,
they handled that word as
if it was nothing more than
some scrambled eggs on a
platter. 'Ho-Hum, so boring!'
Not for me, ever. (And another
thing, how did 'clerics' - church
people, who do clerical things,
how did that word get turned
over to the sort of boring
office work and 'clerical' details
that keep so many so busy
for so little. Talk about 
diminishment!)....The
complete concept of 'God'
and the extent of omnipotence
baffled me. First off, it is NOT
in any way a comparative word,
which makes it already difficult
to grasp. There can be no
'degrees' of omnipotence; it's
either all or nothing. And if 
one guy has it, like this God
concept portrays, then no one
else, no other entity, can 
equally have it, nor any part
of it, since it's not a comparative
word, as I said. It was always
my personal inclination to see
that as the origin of 'Devil,'
such being another (losing)
claimant to 'Omnipotence' 
or even some part of it 
(though impossible). That
then was the breaking point
among all those Divine
creatures. Lucifer, after
all (Latin again) being
made up of the Latinate
factor for 'light.' But,
apparently, 'fallen' too.
I could see all this with
the ancient Gods, all
those Assyrian, Egyptian,
and Mesoptamian Gods,
and the Greek Gods on
Mount Olympus and all.
always brawling and
fighting with each other,
stealing God wives and
special talents and the 
rest. But the Judaic 
thing, One G-d, amid 
reverence and perfection,
anger, war, no foibles, 
and then its influence
and transfer into all the 
Christian later civilization
things we know of  -  it
just never washed. I had
more faith in those twisted
weirdos from the Salem
Witch Trials than I did
in these stories of power
and glory. At least the
witch goons, and the
accusers and torturers 
and killers, were tainted 
and flawed people. Any
'Omnipotence' was the
last thing on their mind.
More like 'Pittance.'
-
Does all this get pretty 
boring? I'm not sure
people even really like
to read anymore, but
these strings of words
that I patch together, I
always try to keep ideas
twisting within them, 
and, as well, I throw 
in zingers that become
un-missable. Remarkable.
Like 'able to be remarked
upon,' which is somehow
a combination of 'mark' and
then 're'mark, as in go back
and do it again. If you can't
be quite, well Hell, say
something, anything.
Lucifer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RUDIMENTS 997.

RUDIMENTS, pt. 997 (at the bongo club) I never had much direction, or what direction I had I gave to myself, be it good or bad. On looking back now (seems that's all I do these days) I sense that I was easily swayed and was often quite zig-zag in my ways. (I don't mean zig-zag in the sense of the Zig Zag rolling papers guy, which papers were used for rolling joints, and which name I was often told by a guy I worked for once, that I resembled. Well, the person of that name anyway, shown on the packaging). Fact is, I never smoked much pot. Maybe three or four times. It never interested me, whereas this guy who said it smoked pot like other people ate chocolate. I was around lots of that stuff, and more (pot, not chocolate). First off, pot was for babies. Beginner's stuff. The kind of people I knew then who were potheads were all in a sort of stalled, infantile regression, and their pot-smoking only dragged them deeper into place - they neve...

1130.

RUDIMENTS, pt. 1,030 (otis redding?) I used to sit in John's house and look at things around me  - it was possible there to think of it still being, say, 1924. Mary and he kept a severe and steady, old-format, household. I'd sit there and think to myself that this was 'quality,' the way it maybe used to be. There seemed to be, kept by John and Mary, a transcendance to things, some quality that was above everything and realized the old days  -  before plastics and gilt had a claim to the storyboard of everyone's life. Of course, it wasn't conscious, they didn't have an awareness of it; for that was their characters and it was ingrained. The lens they looked through to see and partake life was of it, and they realized not. It only stood out so grandly to others, like myself, and was remarked upon often; like visiting an old catacomb in an ancient village. Something like that affects everything else aroun...

RUDIMENTS 1148.

RUDIMENTS, pt. 1,148 (words were never enough) The 'myth' of mythology had always led me along  -  to believing that I'd see griffins, two-headed monsters, dragons that breathed fire, and flighty wood-nymphs too. None of it ever happened, of course, but I still believed. For a normal, hetero-sexual guy (and I say normal' because, yes, sorry to say, I believe that to be the right and natural way; all you same-sexers can talk this over amongst yourselves. Sorry), the deliverance from any of that mythology stuff always seemed, for me, to be the liberation of the female body, or form. There was never anything better for me, so I ran with that as the best of all mythology, the feminine-form divine. (Hey! Maybe then that makes ME a lesbian? Does that get a capital 'L' yet, by the way?). - In its prideful notations to the modern day, modern Humankind rebuffs all those 'mythological' beasts and beings,...